| 000 | 01272cab a2200361 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS59094 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u87416 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aWignall, G. | ||
| 245 | _aHandling boundary disputes: points of evidence | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aSolicitors` Journal _v142(26) 3 July 1998, 626-627(2) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the determination of factual issues in boundary disputes and how the courts approach the general questions of evidence. Discusses rebuttal presumptions, hedges and ditches, Ordnance Survey maps, fence types and history of existing features. Comments on disputes concerning the boundaries of railway lines. | ||
| 650 | _aALAN WIBBERLEY BUILDING LTD V INSLEY | ||
| 650 |
_aBoundary disputes _96221 |
||
| 650 | _aDAVEY V HARROW CORPORATION | ||
| 650 | _aDITCHES | ||
| 650 | _aEXISTING FEATURES | ||
| 650 | _aEXPERT EVIDENCE | ||
| 650 | _aFALKINGTON V FARLEY | ||
| 650 | _aFENCES | ||
| 650 | _aHALL V DORLING | ||
| 650 | _aHEDGES | ||
| 650 | _aNEILSON V POOLE | ||
| 650 | _aORDNANCE SURVEY MAP | ||
| 650 | _aRAILWAY LINES | ||
| 650 | _aREBUTTAL PRESUMPTION | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c15/07/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c55127 _d55127 |
||