| 000 | 00899cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS58986 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u87502 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aBrewer, G. | ||
| 245 | _aWhen global claims are deemed inappropriate | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v394(6183) 8 July 1998, 24(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDefines a global claim and discusses the principle established in the case of "J Crosby and Sons v Portland Urban DC". Considers the CA decision in February 1998 in the case of "Inserco Ltd v Honeywell Control Systems". | ||
| 650 | _aEXTRA WORK | ||
| 650 | _aGLOBAL CLAIMS | ||
| 650 | _aINSERCO V HONEYWELL CONTROL SYSTEMS | ||
| 650 | _aJ CROSBY AND SONS LTD V PORTLAND UDC | ||
| 650 | _aORIGINAL WORK | ||
| 650 | _aPROFIT | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c20/07/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c55197 _d55197 |
||