| 000 | 01605cab a2200325 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X93058 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u87607 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aR v Dudley Magistrates Court, ex p Hollis; Hollis v Dudley MDC; Probert v Dudley Metropolitan Council | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v[1998] JPL 652-664(13) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 25 November 1997. Local authority tenants - complaints laid under s82 EPA 90 alleging statutory nuisance - Council indicated works would be undertaken but not within required timescale - tenants costs of proceedings disallowed in Magistrates Court - appeal by way of case stated - application for judicial review of magistrates decision to adjourn - interpretation of s82(12) EPA 1990 - Court not entitled to refuse costs on grounds that complaints unreasonably laid - adjournment could not be granted to avoid the consequences the law provided would follow should the hearing proceed - appeal aand application allowed. | ||
| 650 | _aBOTROSS V HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM LBC | ||
| 650 | _aCOSTS | ||
| 650 | _aENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT 1990 S79 | ||
| 650 | _aENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT 1990 S82 | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORDS | ||
| 650 | _aNOTICE OF DEFECTS | ||
| 650 | _aR V LIVERPOOL CROWN COURT EX P COOK | ||
| 650 | _aREASONABLENESS | ||
| 650 | _aSTATUTORY NUISANCE | ||
| 650 | _aTENANTS | ||
| 650 | _aWORKS | ||
| 650 | _aWRITTEN NOTICE | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c23/07/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c55268 _d55268 |
||