| 000 | 01305cab a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS52939 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u992 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aPeacock v SoS Environment | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1995) 69 P&CR 388-393(3) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 14 June 1994. P appealed against refusal of planning permission for retention of a large poultry house. Use of the land for agriculture did not need planning permission as it did not constitute development under Town and Country Planning Act 1990. Under the General Development Order P could erect an agricultural building under sch 2 part 6 Class A, but this was excluded as the building would be within 25m of a classified road. P appealed against the decision. Appeal dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aFARM BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aGENERAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER 1988 | ||
| 650 | _aINTENSIVE LIVESTOCK BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aPEACOCK V SOS ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 650 | _aPERMITTED DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aPOULTRY HOUSE | ||
| 650 | _aREFUSAL | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 | ||
| 650 | _aTRAFFIC SAFETY | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c553 _d553 |
||