| 000 | 01032cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS59072 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u87708 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aLewison, K. | ||
| 245 | _aCat-in-the box paradox of expiring tenancies | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty Week _v63(13) 17 July 1998, 34(1) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the provisions of Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II, relating to a tenant`s occupation of premises for business purposes. Discusses the conflicting court decisions in "Esselte v Pearl Assurance" and "Bacchiochi v Academic Agency". | ||
| 650 | _aBACCHIOCCHI V ACADEMIC AGENCY LTD | ||
| 650 | _aBUSINESS PURPOSES | ||
| 650 | _aESSELTE V PEARL ASSURANCE | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PART II | ||
| 650 | _aCOMMERCIAL LEASES | ||
| 650 | _aOCCUPATION | ||
| 650 | _aTERMINATION | ||
| 650 | _aVACATION OF PROPERTY | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c29/07/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c55340 _d55340 |
||