000			01714cab a2200325 4500
001			ABS59198
008			090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u87908
041			_aeng
245			_aVerkan & Co Ltd v Byland Close (Winchmore Hill) Ltd and another
260			_c1998
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[1998] 28EG 118-125(8)
520			_aLT 4 March 1998. The appellant landlord owned five blocks of flats let on long leases at low ground rents. A notice of collective enfranchisement was served in September 1995, but not all tenants participated in the notice. The landlord appealed the decision of the LVT raising issues, inter alia, as to the value of the leases, the appropriate yields and the valuation approach for non-participating flats. "Held " where a competent LVT has decided matters of fact and value on the opinion evidence of valuers and an inspection of the premises, and there is no suggestion of dispute as to matters of law or of valuation principle, then the LT should be slow to disturb the decison of the LVT unless satisfied that it is clearly wrong. Appeal dismissed.
650			_aCOLLECTIVE ENFRANCHISEMENT
650			_aHOPE VALUE
650			_aLANDLORDS
650			_aLEASE EXTENSIONS
650			_aLEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
650			_aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993
650			_aMARRIAGE VALUE
650			_aREVERSIONARY VALUATIONS
650			_aSINCLAIR GARDENS INVESTMENTS (KENSINGTON) LTD V FRANKS
650			_aSWANN V WHITE AND OTHERS
650			_aTENANTS
650			_aWILLING SELLER
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-LEASEHOLD REFORM
942			_n0
948			_c07/08/1998
999			_c55480 _d55480