000			01768cab a2200469 4500
001			ABS59222
008			090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u87916
041			_aeng
100			_aWignall, G.
245			_aHandling nuisance claims: the duty to abate a hazard
260			_c1998
350			_a0
490			_aSolicitors` Journal _v142(30) 31 July 1998, 720-721(2)
520			_aRejects a suggestion that it is time to call a halt to the law of private nuisance by physical damage and to subsume all such cases into the law of negligence. Since the law of private nuisance is a robust tort with significant practical advantages to the plaintiff and it is important in understanding the relationship between nuisance and negligence.
650			_aBARKER V HERBERT
650			_aBRADBURN V LINDSAY
650			_aBRS V SLATER
650			_aCAMBRIDGE WATER CO LTD V EASTERN COUNTIES LEATHER PLC (CA)
650			_aGILES V WALKER
650			_aGOLDMAN V HARGRAVE
650			_aHAZARDS
650			_aHUNTER V CANARY WHARF
650			_aHUSSAIN V LANCASTER CC
650			_aJOB EDWARDS V BIRMINGHAM NAVIGATIONS
650			_aLANDOWNERS
650			_aNEGLIGENCE
650			_aPAGE MOTORS V EPSOM AND EWELL BC
650			_aPHYSICAL DAMAGE
650			_aPONTARDAWE RC V MOORE-GWYN
650			_aPRIVATE NUISANCE
650			_aRADSTOCK CO-OPERATIVE V NORTON-RADSTOCK
650			_aRYLANDS V FLETCHER
650			_aSAINT V JENNER
650			_aSEDLEIGH-DENFIELD V O'CALLAGHAN
650			_aSMITH V LITTLEWOODS ORGANISATION LTD
650			_aSPARKE V OSBORNE
650			_aTATE AND LYLE INDUSTRIES V GREATER LONDON COUNCIL
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c10/08/1998
999			_c55483 _d55483