| 000 | 01580cab a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS59217 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u87962 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aAmpliflaire Ltd and others v SoS Scotland | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aScottish Civil Law Reports _v[1998] SCLR 565-568(4) |
||
| 520 | _aInner House (Extra Division) 4 February 1998. The company obtained planning permission for the development of a church, which was a listed building. Various structures were erected within the curtilage of the church. The planning authority served enforcement notices requiring that the partially completed structure, which was of substantial size and had a marked visual impact be dismantled and removed from the site. The appellant`s appeal against the enforcement notice was dismissed by the reporter of the SoS. The appellant appealed specifying six grounds, including the contention that the reporter wrongly determined that a free-standing structure is subject to listed building control. The court refused all grounds of appeal. | ||
| 650 | _aALTERATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aCOTSWOLD DC V SOS ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 650 | _aENFORCEMENT NOTICES | ||
| 650 | _aEXTENSIONS | ||
| 650 | _aFREE STANDING | ||
| 650 | _aLISTED BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSIONS | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (SCOTLAND) ACT 1972 | ||
| 650 | _aVISUAL IMPACT | ||
| 650 | _aWINDSOR AND MAIDENHEAD BC V SOS ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c12/08/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c55520 _d55520 |
||