| 000 | 00922cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS59224 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u87997 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aMoore, L. | ||
| 245 | _aRecognition of contamination stigma paves way for claims | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty Week _v63(16) 7 August 1998, 24(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the decision in the case of "Blue Circle Industries v MoD" which sets out criteria for assessing damages for property damage due to contamination. Comments on the damages awarded for loss of value of the property because of residual stigma. | ||
| 650 | _aBLUE CIRCLE INDUSTRIES PLC V MOD | ||
| 650 |
_aContamination _96231 |
||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY VALUE | ||
| 650 | _aSTIGMA | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 700 | _aHeitman, A. | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c14/08/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c55555 _d55555 |
||