000			01484cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS38168
008			090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u8987
041			_aeng
245			_aLee v Heaton and Another
260			_c1987
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v283(6350) 5 September 1987, 1076-1077(2)
520			_aAppeal by the tenant(T) from an award made by the arbitrator, under the Milk (Community Outgoers Scheme ) (England and Wales) Regulations 1986, who had rejected a claim for compensation for discontinuance of milk production. In the tenancy agreement T had covenanted "not to dispose of the whole or any part of any basic quota under a marketing scheme...", and the landlords withheld their consent to allow T to discontinue production. The arbitrator upheld the landlords` refusal as not unreasonable under the regulations due to the existence of the covenant. The point was not taken before the arbitrator that the covenant did not apply to milk quota . The tenant appealed to the tribunal, submitting that the milk quota which was the subject of the present regulations and which implemented part of the CAP of the EEC , was not "basic quota under a marketing scheme" pursuant to the UK Agricultural Marketing Acts. The tribunal held that the provisions giving effect to the EEC Council and Commi
650			_aDAIRY PRODUCE QUOTA REGULATIONS 1984
690			_aRURAL PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c5568 _d5568