000			01820cab a2200277 4500
001			ABS59359
008			090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u88409
041			_aeng
245			_aUniversity of Westminster v President LT
260			_c1998
350			_a0
490			_aAll England Law Reports _v[1998] 3 ALL ER 1014-1024(13)
520			_aCA 15 July 1998. The University of Westminster (W) applied to the LT to discharge or modify user restrictions on its land. There was no response or objections to the notice of application served on those persons entitled to the benefit of the restrictions. The LT refused to discharge the restrictions on the basis that if the notice had indicated that the applicants sought to remove all restrictions on user there may have been objections. However, it determined that the restrictions should be modified to allow for general education purposes. W appealed contending inter alia that in the absence of evidence that any potential objector was misled by the notice, the LT was bound to discharge the restrictions. CA held that W had failed to satisfy the LT either, that some reasonable user of the land would be impeded unless the restrictions were wholly discharged or, that the persons entitled to the benefit of restrictions had to be taken to have agreed to the discharge. Appeal dismissed.
650			_aDISCHARGE
650			_aEVIDENCE OF AGREEMENT
650			_aGEE V NATIONAL TRUST FOR PLACES OF HISTORIC INTEREST OR NATURAL BEAUTY
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S84
650			_aMODIFICATION
650			_aNOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR DISCHARGE OR MODIFICATION
650			_aRESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
650			_aUSER RESTRICTIONS
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c11/09/1998
999			_c55844 _d55844