000			01611cab a2200301 4500
001			ABS59317
008			090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u88566
041			_aeng
245			_aCrewe services & Investment Corp v Silk
260			_c1998
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[1998] 35 EG 81-86(6) (29/08/98)
520			_a"Crewe services & Investment Corp v Silk" CA 2 December 1997. The appellant tenant held an annual tenancy of an agricultural holding protected by Agricultural Holdings Act 1986. The terms of the tenancy required the tenant to repair buildings and fixtures, farm in accordance with the rules of good husbandry and destroy weeds. Following a schedule of disrepair, the respondent landlord brought proceedings. The judge found the tenant in breach of covenant by failing to cultivate one field, allowing deterioration of a barn and failing to maintain hedges and gates. Damages were assessed at £15,940 including VAT. The tenant appealed contending, inter alia, that it was wrong to use the costs of repairs as a measure of damages and that the landlord had not proved any damage to its revision. Held: Appeal was allowed.
650			_aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ACT 1986
650			_aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS
650			_aBARN
650			_aBREACH OF COVENANT
650			_aCREWE SERVICES & INVESTMENT CORP V SILK
650			_aDAMAGES
650			_aGATES
650			_aHEDGES
650			_aREPAIRS
650			_aWEEDS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c22/09/1998
999			_c55975 _d55975