| 000 | 01339cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS54212 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u9044 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aR v Surrey CC ex parte Oakimber Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1995) 70 P&CR 649-656(5) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 27 June 1995. SCC had designated over 370 acres, including an historic racetrack and airfield, as a conservation area. The site had been subject to comprehensive modern development. The applicant alleged the SCC failed to have regard to the proper extent of the area, and that the decision was irrational, and it was undesirable to have additional controls on an area indistinguishable from other development areas. Application dismissed. Court held that the line drawn was not irrational and that the development did not destroy the historic interest attached to the area. The court would be slow to interfere especially on the grounds of irrationality. | ||
| 650 | _aAREA OF HISTORIC INTEREST | ||
| 650 | _aBROOKLANDS RACING TRACK | ||
| 650 | _aCOMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 650 | _aCONSERVATION AREA | ||
| 650 | _aDESIGNATION | ||
| 650 | _aRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c5605 _d5605 |
||