000			01682cab a2200325 4500
001			ABS59555
008			090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u88983
041			_aeng
245			_aPayne and another v Barnet LBC
260			_c1998
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v[1998] 76 P&CR 293-311(16)
520			_aCA 22 May 1997. P and W exercised their right to buy the lease on a prefabricated maisonette from B. Upon arranging a mortgage the building society`s valuer warned that there might be certain defects which would make it difficult to arrange further mortgage finance and resale, and advised a more detailed survey. P and W did not obtain a further report. When P and W sought to sell the property, a prospective purchaser failed to secure a mortgage due to defects. P and W brought action against B, claiming that previous surveys undertaken by B that highlighted the problems had never been disclosed. However, the claim was not issued until after the limitation period expired. The court below struck out the claim as disclosing no reasonable course of action and/or being an abuse of process. Appeal allowed.
650			_aBUILDING DEFECTS
650			_aBUILDING SURVEYS
650			_aCONDITION SURVEYS
650			_aLEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
650			_aLIMITATION PERIOD
650			_aMORTGAGE VALUATIONS
650			_aNEGLIGENCE
650			_aNON-DISCLOSURE
650			_aPAYNE AND ANOTHER V BARNET LBC
650			_aPREFABRICATED HOUSING
650			_aRIGHT TO BUY
650			_aSTATUTORY DUTY
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c14/10/1998
999			_c56267 _d56267