| 000 | 01041cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS59524 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u88985 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aR v East Hertfordshire DC ex parte Beckman | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v[1998] 76 P&CR 333-337(5) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 26 July 1997. Local planning authority H granted planning permission on land where two previous identical applications had been refused. The difference this time, H claimed, was that it had a letter of approval of security from the police. This was infact incorrect as the letter existed at the time of the previous application. A judicial review sought be an adjoining landowner to quash the decision was allowed. | ||
| 650 | _aJUDICIAL REVIEW | ||
| 650 | _aMATERIAL CHANGE | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aR V EAST HERTFORDSHIRE DC EX P BECKMAN | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c14/10/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c56269 _d56269 |
||