000			01521cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS38188
008			090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u9090
041			_aeng
245			_aSmith and another v Northside Developments and another
260			_c1987
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v283(6351) 12 September 1987, 1211-1215(3)
520			_aCA 11 May 1987. An appeal by the occupiers(S), and a cross-appeal by the owners(N) from a county court decision. At issue was whether S occupied shop premises under a licence or tenancy . S were co-occupiers with a third party of a shop in Camden Lock Market. S and the third party carried out their respective businesses on different sides of the premises. The third party left, and S took over the whole space paying the other half of the rent, after making an oral agreement with N. The question as to legal occupancy arose when S were given notice to leave within seven to eight days. S claimed they had obtained an exclusive right to occupation. The county couret rejected this claim, but held that S` licence was not properly terminated by the length of notice given, and that a reasonable period was one month. S appealed against the decision on exclusive possession , and N cross-appealed against the length of notice. The CA held that no evidence existed which showed there was an argument
650			_aSTREET V MOUNTFORD
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c5633 _d5633