| 000 | 00770cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X94506 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u89125 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aMichael Shamley Group v SoS Environment & Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aNew Property Cases _v[1998] NPC 140, (3) |
||
| 520 | _a13 October 1998. LPA`s local plan evidence contradicted by LPA at subsequent planning appeal. Inspector has duty to say why he prefers evidence to former. Taken from report header. NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED. | ||
| 650 | _aMICHAEL SHANLEY GROUP V SOS ENVIRONMENT & RB OF WINDSOR & MAIDENHEAD | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c20/10/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c56353 _d56353 |
||