| 000 | 01072cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS59401 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u89300 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aBrewer, G. | ||
| 245 | _aJudging standards of care | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v395(6197) 14 October 1998, 33(1) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the different approaches taken to the standard of care in design, depending on wether it is undertaken by a professional designer or contractor. Through case law, the issues of implied terms of fitness for purpose and merchantable quality are considered. | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION DESIGN | ||
| 650 | _aFITNESS FOR PURPOSE | ||
| 650 | _aIMPLIED TERMS | ||
| 650 | _aMERCHANTABLE QUALITY | ||
| 650 | _aQV LTD V FREDERICK F SMITH AND OTHERS | ||
| 650 | _aSALE OF GOODS ACT 1979 | ||
| 650 | _aSTANDARD OF CARE | ||
| 650 | _aSUPPLY OF GOODS AND SERVICES ACT 1982 | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION DESIGN | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c27/10/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c56480 _d56480 |
||