000			01548cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS38194
008			090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u9123
041			_aeng
245			_aHodges v Blee
260			_c1987
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v283(6351) 12 September 1987, 1215-1216(2)
520			_aCA 13 May 1987. An appeal on the question of greater hardship under Rent Act 1977 schedule 15 case 9 . The tenant appealed against a decision in the county court granting the landlord possession of the dwelling-house . The landlord sought possession of the house as a residence for his two sons who were living in unsatisfactory accommodation. The tenant who was unemployed, had occupied the house for 15 years, and lived on housing and supplementary benefits. The tenant appealed. On appeal it was held that the CA would only interfere with the original judge`s finding of greater hardship if, 1) the county court judge`s decision was shown to be perverse; 2) the judge had failed to take into consideration all the relevant matters or 3) no evidence existed to support the judge`s findings. The CA were unable to reach these conclusions. The court may have come to a different conclusion from the judge, but unless he had erred in law, his decision on the balance of hardship was conclusive. Appe
650			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c5656 _d5656