000			01757cab a2200301 4500
001			ABS59444
008			090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u89462
041			_aeng
245			_aSingh & Kaur v Leeds CC
260			_c1998
350			_a0
490			_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v[1998] RVR 230-241(12)
520			_aLT 3 April 1997. The claimants (S) owned the freehold interest of a property which was at the end of a terrace, which included an advertising sign subject to a licence agreement of £2,500pa. In 1988 the property was severely damaged by fire. In 1993 S commenced refurbishment works, but before these were competed L sought compulsory purchase on the property. L then offered the property for sale, in its current condition, and received offers no higher than £20,000. In 1995 the property was destroyed by fire. In claiming compensation for compulsory acquisition, S claimed £120,814, based on the zoning method of valuation; assuming total reconstruction value at the time of the acquisition order, and taking into account reconstruction costs and advertising rights. The council returned a valuation of nil. "Held" Compensation payable at £35,000, being made up of the value of the property for refurbishment and ammended advertising rights valuation.
650			_aADVERTISING BOARDS
650			_aADVERTISING RIGHTS
650			_aCOMPARABLE RENTS
650			_aCOMPULSORY ACQUISITION
650			_aLICENCE AGREEMENTS
650			_aMARKET VALUE
650			_aRefurbishment _96264
650			_aSINGH AND KUAR V LEEDS CC
650			_aVALUATION METHODS
650			_aZONING METHOD
690			_aCOMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/11/1998
999			_c56601 _d56601