000			01500cab a2200337 4500
001			ABS59695
008			090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u89617
041			_aeng
245			_aSouthwark LBC v Mills and others
260			_c1998
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[1998] 45 EG 151-160(10)
520			_aCA 29 July 1998. S owns a block of flats with inadequate soundproofing. The local arbitration tribunal considered the covenant for quiet enjoyment and ordered S to carry out soundproofing works. This decision was upheld by the court. S appealed. "Held" There was not an abstract standard of quietness to which every tenant with a covenant of quiet enjoyment was entitled irrespective of the circumstances in which he executed the lease and the location of the property. Appeal allowed.
650			_aBAXTER V CAMDEN LBC
650			_aCHARTERED TRUST PLC V DAVIES
650			_aDUKE OF WESTMINSTER V GUILD
650			_aHILTON V JAMES SMITH AND SONS (NORWOOD) LTD
650			_aINVESTORS COMPENSATION SCHEME LTD V WEST BROMWICH BUILDING SOCIETY
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT _96252
650			_aLANDLORDS OBLIGATIONS
650			_aNUISANCE
650			_aQUICK V TAFF ELY BC
650			_aQUIET ENJOYMENT
650			_aSAMPSON V HODSON-PRESSINGER
650			_aSANDERSON V BERWICK-ON-TWEED
650			_aSOUNDPROOFING
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c11/11/1998
999			_c56725 _d56725