| 000 | 01089cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3445-36 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u89924 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRent review | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[1998] EGCS 161 (21/11/98) |
||
| 520 | _a"St Martins Property Ltd v Citicorp Investment Bank Ltd and another" CA 11 November 1998. Valuation assumptions based on contents of a hypothetical lease. At issue was the length of the term, whether a break clause in favour of a named tenant should be read as in favour of a notional tenant and whether the landlord was entitled to recover headline rent as from the review date. All delarations were refused. Landlord appealed. appeal dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aBREAK CLAUSE | ||
| 650 | _aHEADLINE RENTS | ||
| 650 | _aHYPOTHETICAL LEASE | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEW | ||
| 650 | _aST MARTINS PROPERTY LTD V CITICORP INVESTMENT BANK PROPERTIES LTD AND | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c25/11/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c56936 _d56936 |
||