000			01513cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS38204
008			090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u9190
041			_aeng
245			_aCooke and Arkwright (a firm) v Haydon
260			_c1987
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v283(6350) 5 September 1987, 1068-1071(3)
520			_aCA 26 June 1987. An appeal on the wording on a professional indemnity policy. A partner in Cooke and Arkwright, (C&A), became a partner in the Merak partnership, along with other professionals, to provide clients with a combined service covering the expertise of the professionals. It was also intended that Merak would employ the respective professional firms as subcontractors when required. In 1981, Merak was engaged by Co-operative Retail Services Ltd , (CRS), to design and supervise construction of a superstore. In 1982, the store was damaged by fire ; in October 1984 CRS informed Merak that it was holding them responsible for the damage. CRS issued proceedings against Merak and other defendants alleging breach of contract or negligence in respect of defective design or inadequate inspection, supervision or advice. Merak joined C&A as third parties, alleging the work had been subcontracted to C&A. At issue in proceedings brought by C&A against their insurance underwriter, was wheth
650			_aABOUT RICS-RICS MEMBERS
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c5702 _d5702