| 000 | 00720cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3446-35 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u90052 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBoundary dispute | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[1998] EGCS 166, (1) (28/11/98) |
||
| 520 | _a"Reed v Graham" CA 17 November 1998. A judge is expected to take in to account all evidence in a boundary dispute when an initial order is ambiguous. | ||
| 650 |
_aBoundary disputes _96221 |
||
| 650 | _aCONSENT ORDER | ||
| 650 | _aEVIDENCE | ||
| 650 | _aREED V GRAHAM | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c01/12/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c57030 _d57030 |
||