| 000 | 00993cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS59691 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u90087 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aTolson, S. | ||
| 245 | _aQuiet disenjoymnet | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v263(8066) 27 November 1998, 59(1) |
||
| 520 | _aReviews interpretation of a covenant of `quiet enjoyment` as deemed to have been given by the landlord, focussing not on the basis of liability but on the parameters to be placed on it. Discusses "Southwark Council v Mills" and Baxter v Camden Council, where both landlords were found not liable under the covenant. | ||
| 650 | _aBAXTER V CAMDEN COUNCIL | ||
| 650 | _aLIABILITY | ||
| 650 | _aQUIET ENJOYMENT | ||
| 650 | _aREPAIRING COVENANT | ||
| 650 | _aSOUTHWARK COUNCIL V MILLS | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c02/12/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c57060 _d57060 |
||