| 000 | 01227cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X95638 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u90279 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aStretch v West Dorset DC | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[1998] 48 EG 183-186(6) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 11 November 1998. S took out an originating summons seeking declarations against W stating that he was entitled to and had validly exercised his option to the grant of a further term of 21 years and an order of specific performance or damages in lieu. The defendants W resisted S`s claims on two points (1) the option was ultra vires (2) assignment of interest. "Held": the power to let did not include the power to grant an option. And as a result of S assigning his interest in five of the subleases for terms that exceeded the original lease, the option ceased to be excisable at all. Appeal dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aAPPROPRIATION OF LAND | ||
| 650 | _aASSIGNMENT OF INTEREST | ||
| 650 | _aOPTION TO RENEW | ||
| 650 | _aSTRETCH V UNITED KINGDOM | ||
| 650 | _aULTRA VIRES | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c14/12/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c57219 _d57219 |
||