| 000 | 01120cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS59850 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u90396 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aLingard, J. | ||
| 245 | 4 | _aThe impact of contractor selection method on transaction costs: a review | |
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Construction Procurement _v4(2) November 1998, 89-102(14) |
||
| 520 | _aReviews the research evidence which suggests that although competitive tendering typically results in the lowest bidder winning the contract this may not represent the lowest project cost after completion. Research is still needed to investigate the imapct of different methods of contractor selection on the costs of entering into a contract and the decision to outsource (from journal abstract) | ||
| 650 | _aBID EVALUATION | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACTOR SELECTION | ||
| 650 | _aPRE-QUALIFICATION PROCESS | ||
| 650 | _aTRANSACTION COSTS | ||
| 690 |
_aProject management _96261 |
||
| 700 | _aChinyio, E. | ||
| 700 | _aHughes, W. | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c21/12/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c57311 _d57311 |
||