| 000 | 01441cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS59831 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u90446 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aJohnson and another v Davies and another | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Law Reports _v[1998] 49 EG 153-160(8) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 18 March 1998. Appeal bought by the defendants D, against the decision that they were obligated to indemnify the plaintiffs. J were principal shareholders in a company before selling out to D and Mr Hopkins H. Subsequently the company was placed in receivership, and J satisfied the landlords claims, but sought reimbursement from D on the basis of a share sale agreement. The defendants contended that they were released from their obligation to indemnify due to a voluntary arrangement entered into by H which J voted in favour of. The judge ruled that the words used in the voluntary agreement were inconsistant with the intention to release the defendants from their liability as co-debtors. Held, appe£al dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aINDEMNIFICATION CLAUSES | ||
| 650 | _aINSOLVENCY ACT 1986 | ||
| 650 | _aINSOLVENCY VOLUNTARY ARRANGEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aJOHNSON AND ANOTHER V DAVIES AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aSHARE SALE AGREEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aSURETIES | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c22/12/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c57348 _d57348 |
||