| 000 | 00969cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS59843 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u90463 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aMartin, J. | ||
| 245 | _aWrite and wrong | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v9851 19 December 1998, 78-79(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscussion on the recent consultation paper `Improving planning appeal procedures` issued by the DETR. Reviews its recommendations in relation to the written procedure and considers a recent Hight Court decision involving a challenge to an inspector`s decision in a written representations appeal. | ||
| 650 | _aAPPEALS | ||
| 650 | _aCOSTS | ||
| 650 | _aSHAW V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND WIRRAL MBC | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S288 | ||
| 650 | _aWRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 700 | _aEdwards, M. | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c23/12/1998 | ||
| 999 |
_c57359 _d57359 |
||