| 000 | 01009cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS50907 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u1042 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aR v Worthing BC, ex parte Bruce |
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1994) 24 EG 149-152(4) |
|
| 520 | _aCA, 20 October 1993. An appeal was dismissed in a situation where a tenant claimed to have a secure tenancy and right to buy and an order by consent was enforced. It was held that it was not necessary for there to be express admission that the appellant did not have a secure tenancy. A consent order was undoubtedly an implied admission that the appellant did not enjoy protection, if not an express admission. | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aHOUSING ACT 1985 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aR V WORTHING BC EX P BRUCE |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c575 _d575 |
||