| 000 | 00961cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3503-35 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u90789 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRent review | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[1998] EGCS 187 (16/01/99) |
||
| 520 | _a"Banks and another v Kokkinos and another" ChD 17 December 1998. Tenants were entitled to propose rent on landlords failing to initiate review procedure. Landlords failed to apply for appointment of valuer within 3 months of proposals and tenants proposed rent at same level as previosu year. Landlords contended that time not intended to be of the essence. Judgment for tenants. | ||
| 650 | _aBANKS AND ANOTHER V KOKKINOS AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 650 | _aTIME LIMITS | ||
| 650 | _aTIME NOT OF THE ESSENCE | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c19/01/1999 | ||
| 999 |
_c57582 _d57582 |
||