000			01847cab a2200301 4500
001			ABS59942
008			090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u90879
041			_aeng
245			_aWildtree Hotels Ltd and others v Harrow LBC
260			_c1998
350			_a0
490			_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v[1998] 38(11) RVR 288-303(16)
520			_aCA 11 June 1998. The claimants (W) owners of a hotel in Harrow, sought compensation under the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 s10 for nuisance by noise, dust and vibration, by erection of hoardings, by obstruction of access to and from the public highway, and by obstruction of public highways. On appeal by W, the CA considered whether the LT were right to decide that (1) compensation was not payable where an interference to some legal right was not a direct interference to land or a right appurtenant to land, (2) where there had been interference with some right which could give rise to a claim for compensation, the quantum of damages recoverable as compensation did not include all injurious affection attributable to and caused by the execution of works. On a cross appeal by the Council, the CA considered whether the LT had erred in deciding that (3) compensation was payable when the interference was temporary. CA dismissed appeals on questions (1) and (2) and allowed (3).
650			_aACCESS
650			_aCOMPENSATION
650			_aCOMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 1965 S10
650			_aHOARDINGS
650			_aINJURIOUS AFFECTION
650			_aLOSS IN VALUE
650			_aNUISANCE
650			_aOBSTRUCTION
650			_aROAD WORKS
650			_aWILDTREE HOTELS LTD AND OTHERS V HARROW LBC
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
942			_n0
948			_c25/01/1999
999			_c57651 _d57651