000			01296cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS60003
008			090401t1999 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u90949
041			_aeng
245			_aGoldstein v Conley
260			_c1999
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette Law Reports _v[1999] 03 EG 137-144(8)
520			_aLT 18 September 1999. The appellant landlord was owner of a reversion to a ground-floor flat in a converted detached house let to the respondant tenant. The lease expired on 25 September 1995. Following the tenant`s claim in March 1995, the LVT determined the price payable for a new 90-year lease to be £143,800. The landlord appealed: the issues in question being the vacant possession value and the apportionment of the marriage value. "Held" the appeal was allowed. The diminution in the landlord`s interest was £128,000, and 72.5% of the marriage value was appropriate for the landlord.
650			_aDETERMINATION OF PRICE
650			_aLEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
650			_aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993
650			_aLEASEHOLD VALUATION TRIBUNAL
650			_aMARRIAGE VALUE
650			_aNEW LEASE
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-LEASEHOLD REFORM
942			_n0
948			_c27/01/1999
999			_c57699 _d57699