| 000 | 01627cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS60057 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1999 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u91003 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aIngram and another v Inland Revenue Commissioners | ||
| 260 | _c1999 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aWeekly Law Reports _v[1999] 2 WLR 91-103(7) |
||
| 520 | _aHL 10 December 1998. The owner (I) of a house and land conveyed the fee simple of the whole property to her solicitor to hold as her nominee. The following day, at I`s direction, the solicitor granted her two identical leases of different parts of the property for 20 years rent free. On the day following, also at I`s direction, the solicitor conveyed the property, subject to the leases, to trustees to hold on trusts for the benefit of her children and grandchildren. Following I`s death, the Inland Revenue Commissioners issued a notice of determination that her estate included the unencumbered freehold property valued at the date of her death on the basis that it was `property subject to a reservation`. Following a decision for the Commissioners in the CA, the HL allowed the appeal by I`s executors and held that the term `property` in the Finance Act 1986 s102 did not refer to something which had physical existence but to a specific interest. | ||
| 650 | _aFINANCE ACT 1986 S102 | ||
| 650 | _aFREEHOLD INTEREST | ||
| 650 | _aINGRAM AND ANOTHER V INLAND REVENUE COMMISSIONERS | ||
| 650 | _aINHERITANCE TAX | ||
| 650 | _aLEASES | ||
| 650 | _aRESERVATION OF BENEFIT | ||
| 690 | _aTAXATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c01/02/1999 | ||
| 999 |
_c57742 _d57742 |
||