000			01080cab a2200289 4500
001			ABS60011
008			090401t1999 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u91021
041			_aeng
100			_aMartin, J.
245			_aCompeting developments
260			_c1999
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(9904) 30 January 1999, 152-153(2)
520			_aDiscusses the case "R v SoS Environment, ex parte Carter Commercial Developments Ltd" which illustrates how competing schemes for retail development can be affected by disputes resulting from the sequential test, as set out in PPG6, and the decision not to call in all the applications.
650			_aPLANNING POLICY
650			_aPLANNING POLICY GUIDANCE NOTE SIX
650			_aR V SOS ENVIRONMENT EX P CARTER COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS LTD
650			_aRETAIL DEVELOPMENT
650			_aSEQUENTIAL TEST
650			_aSUPERMARKETS
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S77
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE
700			_aEdwards, M.
942			_n0
948			_c02/02/1999
999			_c57754 _d57754