| 000 | 01243cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3505-34 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1999 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u91075 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aAgricultural buildings | ||
| 260 | _c1999 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[1999] EGCS 5 (30/01/99) |
||
| 520 | _a"Farmer (VO) v Hambleton DC and another" CA 14 January 1999. Hereditament used for supply of feed to farms. It was occupied by a body corporate but also supplied to non-member companies. At issue was whether the hereditament was an agricultural building and needed to be rated. Valuation Tribunal deleted entry from rating list. VO appealed. LT found insufficient evidence to conclude building was for agricultural use. Body corporate appealed. Appeal allowed and entry on ratings list deleted. | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL OPERATION | ||
| 650 | _aEXEMPTION | ||
| 650 | _aFARM BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aFARMER (VO) V HAMBLETON DC AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aGENERAL RATE ACT 1967 S26 | ||
| 650 | _aPOULTRY FARMS | ||
| 650 | _aPROVENDER MILL | ||
| 650 | _aRATING APPEALS | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c03/02/1999 | ||
| 999 |
_c57786 _d57786 |
||