000			01494cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS59875
008			090401t1999 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u91139
041			_aeng
100			_aCottam, G.
245			_aSpeeding up arbitration
260			_c1999
350			_a0
490			_aConstruction News _v(6601) 4 February 1999, 20(1)
520			_aSummarises the main points of the case "Redland Aggregates v Shepherd Hill" which related to the dispute procedure of the FCEC Blue form of subcontract. Under this procedure, if any dispute arises in connection with the main contract which concerns the subcontract works, the contractor may require the dispute to be dealt with jointly with the dispute under the main contract. The contract does not, however, impose any timetable on the contractor to invoke arbitration. CA ruled that if the contractor is unwilling to bring about a tripartite arbitration, the subcontractor may proceed with an arbitration against the contractor only.
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
650			_aCONTRACT DISPUTES
650			_aFCEC STANDARD FORM OF SUBCONTRACT
650			_aICE CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT
650			_aREDLAND AGGREGATES V SHEPHERD HILL
650			_aSUBCONTRACTORS
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
942			_n0
948			_c05/02/1999
999			_c57836 _d57836