| 000 | 01132cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS60016 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1999 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u91150 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aConnal, C | ||
| 245 | 4 | _aThe age of consents | |
| 260 | _c1999 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(9905) 6 February 1999, 156-157(2) |
||
| 520 | _aLooks at the case of "East Dumbartonshire Council v SoS Scotland and Mactaggart Mickel Ltd" where the judges ruled that when looking at a planning consent, there was no need to import the test of `intention to develop` into assessing whether work has begun on site. Also, very old planning consents are not subject to time limits, once work has begun on site. | ||
| 650 | _aDEVELOPMENT | ||
| 650 | _aEAST DUMBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL V SOS SCOTLAND AND MACTAGGART MICKEL LTD | ||
| 650 | _aINTENTION TO DEVELOP | ||
| 650 | _aMALVERN HILLS DC V SOS ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING CONSENT | ||
| 650 | _aR V ARFON DC EX P WALTON COMMERCIAL GROUP | ||
| 650 | _aTIME LIMITS | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c08/02/1999 | ||
| 999 |
_c57842 _d57842 |
||