| 000 | 00808cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2930-62 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u91247 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aNegligence defence queried | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aCSW - The Property Week _v44(7/8) 12/19 August 1993, 12(1) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the implications of "HIT Finance v Lewis & Tucker" where the defendant`s claim that the lender should have investigated the borrower`s means of repayment more thoroughly was dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aMORTGAGE VALUATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aOFFICE PROPERTY | ||
| 650 | _aVALUATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aVALUERS | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c57901 _d57901 |
||