| 000 | 01661cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS60152 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u91488 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aKleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council and others | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v[1998] RVR, 315-340(26) |
||
| 520 | _aHL 29 October 1998. Under "Hazell v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC", the appellant bank K began proceedings to recover money paid to the respondent local authorities under a mistake of law. The court considered: whether recovery of money paid under a mistake of law should be law; if not whether there should be an exception to recovery on grounds of mistake of law when the law has been changed by judicial decision; the fact that all interest rate swap transactions were fully performed; whether Limitation Act 1980 s32(1)c applied to mistakes of law. Appeal "held": (1) the rule that money paid under a mistake was unrecoverable was no longer law; (2) Payments made under private transactions later changed by judicial decision were recoverable; (3) the defence of honest receipt was not part of common law; (4) no principle said that money paid under a void contract was not recoverable; (5) Limitation Act 1980 s32(1)c applied for recovery of money paid under a mistake of law. | ||
| 650 | _aHONEST RECEIPT | ||
| 650 | _aKLEINWORT BENSON | ||
| 650 | _aLIMITATION ACT 1980 S32(1)C | ||
| 650 | _aLINCOLN CITY COUNCIL | ||
| 650 | _aMISTAKE OF LAW | ||
| 650 | _aRECOVERABILITY | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-PROPERTY FINANCE AND INVESTMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c22/02/1999 | ||
| 999 |
_c58079 _d58079 |
||