| 000 | 01040cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X96830 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1999 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u91497 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aHalifax Financial Services Ltd v Intuitive Systems Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1999 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v[1999] CILL, 1467-1468(2) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 21 December 1998. Obligation to exhaust contractual machinery - Court`s discretion. Did the written agreement require that the dispute resolution procedure in clause 33 be complied with before court proceedings could be issued? Should the court exercise its discretion to stay the proceedings or to adjourn them to allow negotiation to proceed? | ||
| 650 | _aCHANNEL TUNNEL GROUP LTD V BALFOUR BEATTY CONSTRUCTION LTD | ||
| 650 |
_aDISPUTE RESOLUTION _96236 |
||
| 650 | _aSOFTWARE DESIGN | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c22/02/1999 | ||
| 999 |
_c58085 _d58085 |
||