| 000 | 01647cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS60162 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1999 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u91580 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aMorgan Sindall plc v Sawston Farms (Cambs) Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1999 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[1999] EG 7, 135-138(4) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 3 December 1998. In 1991, M was granted an option to purchase a roadway at a price to be determined by a valuer acting as an expert. On 15 October 1996, the expert set the price at £130,000 in a non-speaking valuation. M`s valuer gave the road a low value as it was not required for development in the area. However, S`s valuer set a ransom value of £772,000. Nov 1996, S gave M a grant of right of way for all purposes for land M already owned. M then claimed the valuer`s determination was of no effect because: (1) the valuer must have used a ransom value approach and the RICS practice statements do not allow for inclusion of a `special purchaser` and (2) the valuer had valued the wrong subject matter, as M had limited rights of way under the deed of grant. "Held", appeal dismissed. 1-RICS practice statements are not mandatory in this type of valuation and one cannot assume the valuer`s reasoning. 2-The valuer valued what he was asked to value. | ||
| 650 | _aEXPERT | ||
| 650 | _aMORGAN SINDALL PLC V SAWSTON FARMS (CAMBS) LTD | ||
| 650 | _aNON-SPEAKING VALUATION | ||
| 650 | _aOPTION TO PURCHASE | ||
| 650 | _aRICS VALUATION PRACTICE STATEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aRICS | ||
| 690 | _aHIGHWAYS RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c25/02/1999 | ||
| 999 |
_c58149 _d58149 |
||