| 000 | 01467cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS60199 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1999 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u91816 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aLangevad and another v Chiswick Quay Freeholds Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1999 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[1999] 08 EG 173-176(4) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 11 November 1998. The tenants (L) held leases began in 1977 and 1978 on houses. In 1995, they gave notice under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 to purchase the freeholds on their properties. C agreed to convey the freeholds subject to certain conditions preventing construction or other works. L challenged these conditions, claiming that s10(4) of the 1967 Act concerned covenants related to the user and not developments. L`s claim was dismissed. L appealed. "Held", appeal dismissed. The explanation of "restrictive covenants" given in the Land Charges Act 1925 is commonly used to identify the whole range of restrictive covenants, not just user provisions. Thus, when using the same wording in the 1967 Act, it was intended to imply the full range of restrictive covenants, as in the Land Charges Act 1925. | ||
| 650 | _aCONVEYANCNG | ||
| 650 | _aLAND CHARGES ACT 1925 | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 | ||
| 650 | _aRESTRICTIVE COVENANTS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-LEASEHOLD REFORM | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c05/03/1999 | ||
| 999 |
_c58268 _d58268 |
||