| 000 | 01253cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3510-52 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1999 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u91919 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aMineral operators forced to go green | ||
| 260 | _c1999 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aPlanning (for the Natural and Built Environment) _v5 March 1999, 9(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the HL decision in R v North Yorkshire CC, ex p Brown and another (ABS60210) which upheld the decision that the determination of applications for new planning conditions constituted 'development consent' under the Environment Act 1995. North Yorkshire had agreed new conditions for Wensley Quarry without an environmental impact assessment (EIA) because they thought it did not constitute 'development consent'. Mineral planning authorities must now consider an EIA in all cases. | ||
| 650 | _aENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aENVIRONMENT ACT 1995 | ||
| 650 | _aENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT | ||
| 650 | _aENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aMINERALS | ||
| 650 | _aOLD MINING PERMISSIONS | ||
| 650 | _aR V NORTH YORKSHIRE CC EX P BROWN AND ANOTHER | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c10/03/1999 | ||
| 999 |
_c58284 _d58284 |
||