| 000 | 00802cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2643-39 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u9384 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aMeaning of curtilage | ||
| 260 | _c1990 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEGCS _v1990 119 |
||
| 520 | _aIn James v SOS for the Environment and another QBD 9 October 1990, it was held that an inspector was correct in not allowing the appellant to retain a tennis court built without planning permission as the tennis court did not constitute permitted development within the curtilage of a dwelling house . Application by owner dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aGENERAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER 1988 | ||
| 650 | _aREFUSAL | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c5853 _d5853 |
||