000			01036cab a2200241 4500
001			X98064
008			090401t1999 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u92767
041			_aeng
245			_aSham transaction
260			_c1999
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[1999] EGCS 42 (10 April 1999)_
520			_a"Bhopal and another v Walia" CA 25 March 1999. Tenant signing agreement to pay higher rent-Agreement made solely to enable landlord to mislead his bankers-Tenant continuing to pay at lower rate-Landlord selling freehold to plaintiffs-Whether plaintiffs entitled to rent at the higher rate-Judge finding for plaintiffs-Tenant claiming, on appeal, that agreement a sham-Appeal allowed. JOURNAL HEADNOTE.
650			_aBHOPAL AND ANOTHER V WALIA
650			_aDECEPTION
650			_aHOUSING ACT 1988
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925
650			_aSHAM TRANSACTION
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c15/04/1999
999			_c58802 _d58802