| 000 | 01040cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3519-35 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1999 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u93443 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aDivided by a wall | ||
| 260 | _c1999 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(9919) 15 May 1999, 160(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the issue of adverse possession with regard to the case Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Waterloo Real Estate Inc, in which both parties claimed title to a wall which had become key to the redevelopment of both properties. Concludes that adverse possession requires exclusive possession and a demonstrable intention to exclude everyone, and that the test of such intention is the same whether or not the squatter is a conscious trespasser. | ||
| 650 | _aADVERSE POSSESSION | ||
| 650 |
_aParty walls _96258 |
||
| 650 | _aPRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE CO LTD V WATERLOO REAL ESTATE INC | ||
| 650 | _aTRESPASS | ||
| 690 | _aHIGHWAYS RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c19/05/1999 | ||
| 999 |
_c59220 _d59220 |
||