| 000 | 01140cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3520-27 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1999 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u93548 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aContinuing alone | ||
| 260 | _c1999 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(9902) 22 May 1999, 155(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses de Rothschild v Bell in which it was decided that a tenant was entitled to remain in possession of a property under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 part I, despite being only one of two joint tenants. It was held that the Act conferred protection on 'persons rather than legal concepts'. It was also held that unlike a statutory tenancy, a continuation tenancy is a property interest and may therefore vest in a trustee in bankruptcy. | ||
| 650 | _aBANKRUPTCY | ||
| 650 | _aCONTINUATION TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aDE ROTHSCHILD V BELL | ||
| 650 |
_aInsolvency _96247 |
||
| 650 | _aJOINT TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PART I | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c25/05/1999 | ||
| 999 |
_c59278 _d59278 |
||