| 000 | 01053cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS60644 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1999 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u93639 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aLewison, K. | ||
| 245 | _aDigging into the hedge and ditch question | ||
| 260 | _c1999 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty Week _v64(19) 14 May 1999, 37(1) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the hedge and ditch presumption with reference to Alan Wibberley v Insley, a case where the HL reversed a CA decision, and held that even where the conveyance is framed with reference to the Ordnance Survey map, the hedge and ditch presumption still applies. Suggests that in the future there may be more emphasis on the title deeds of the person claiming possession, and less attention paid to those of the person in possession. | ||
| 650 | _aALAN WIBBERLEY BUILDING LTD V INSLEY | ||
| 650 |
_aBoundary disputes _96221 |
||
| 650 | _aHEDGE AND DITCH PRESUMPTION | ||
| 690 | _aHIGHWAYS RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c28/05/1999 | ||
| 999 |
_c59349 _d59349 |
||