000			01068cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS60794Looks at case law on the subject of whether a tenant unintentionally forced out of business premises still remains in occupation within the meaning of S23(I) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. Concludes that the tenant's intention to return to the premises once they are reinstated is central to the issue.
008			090401t1999 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u93910
041			_aeng
100			_aCohn, M.
245		4	_aThe intent to occupy
260			_c1999
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(9922) 5 June 1999, 140-141(2)
650			_aBUSINESS PREMISES
650			_aFLAIRLINE PROPERTIES LTD V HASSAN
650			_aI&H CAPLAN LTD V CAPLAN
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S23(1)
650			_aMORRISON HOLDINGS LTD V MANDERS PROPERTY (WOLVERHAMPTON) LTD
650			_aOCCUPATION
650			_aTENANTS INTENTIONS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c14/06/1999
999			_c59513 _d59513